Code:
<meta name="language" content="en-CA" />
versus
Code:
<meta http-equiv="content-language" content="en-CA" />
Cynthia Says insists that the former be present, even when the latter is. It won't a pass a page without it, even if the latter is omitted.
Even when the response header clearly states content-language, Cynthia Says won't pass the page. But it will if just the name"language" attribute is present, and no other HTTP response.
Where it gets confusing is that USEFUL META TAGS, a link someone once posted, and W3C both offer no reference to this meta tag. What's the case?
Out of respect for the Cynthia Says testing engine and criteria, I include the tag, and set the HTTP content-language response on the server where possible, or omit the http-equiv tag if not.
What is the correct thing to do?