Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewkeet
Hello.
1. Have other relevant sites link to yours.
2. Submit your site to relevant directories such as the Open Directory Project and Yahoo!, as well as to other industry-specific expert sites.
Has been removed from Google Webmaster Guidelines.
Is this the end of directories ?.
Thank You.
|
Or the start of the revenge of mininets?
How Mininets Can Compete with the Top Ranked Sites
http://www.sellwhatyouknow.com/dynamiclinking.pdf
Quote:
Originally Posted by sofomor
They are already irrelevant. Talking about the free ones which make you wait 4-6 months. Imagine waiting for a SINGLE LINK for that period. SMO (social media optimization) could be intelligently used to gain more grounds.
Thank you
|
Why not a single answer
Search relevance, trust and meaningless SERP's
to this important post?
Related subject:
Pay per static brand link a better solution for professional publishers.
I am sure there is nothing som SE's fear more than good human ordered, ranked and collected links. Perhaps not Google, since no SE can compete with Google's speed. In addition since I personally regard Google as "a SE for Wikipedia" (The meta SE Clusty is better here IMO), Google can not be afraid of Wikipedia. And that also indicates that (IB)Links's are still the most important aspect of Google's SE algorithm. Difficult to make a better model.