View Single Post
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 08-28-2008, 01:28 PM
crankydave's Avatar
crankydave crankydave is online now
Moderator
WebProWorld Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Playing with fire!
Posts: 4,253
crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9
Default Re: Top 10 web design firms use black-hat SEO

Quote:
Originally Posted by janeth View Post
Just a thought,

If you had a tool that was constantly measuring, updating and changing, I'd think you could get a pretty good idea of how things worked.

Even more so if it was doing on lots of sites on many different topics and comparing the data.

You would not know for sure but you'd have a pretty good idea.
I don't disagree. There are a lot of things that could be analized that would help give you an idea. I wasn't trying to suggest otherwise.

With well over 200 factors taken into account (I believe that's a correct number) it would be virtual impossible to isolate the effects of any one of them and virtually impossible to measure all the different combinations of effects each one has on the other including any external effects on what is internal or on page.

Now I say virtually because if one had access to the total algorithm (including any filters) then one could determine what is "valued" how and why.

Dave
Reply With Quote