Thread: Google and Cloaking
View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-10-2008, 09:09 AM
Webnauts's Avatar
Webnauts Webnauts is offline
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 8,168
Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9
Default Re: Google and Cloaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by activeco View Post
Again, don't hide anything.
I am not sure why do you so desperately insist on different cloaking versions, instead of trying the suggested way. Why don't you simply implement the frames test as intended?
1. Our sites are build in XHTML Strict 1.0 and this document type does not support iframes.
2. We are seriously concerned about the accessibility of our web sites, and iframes are problematic there.

Any point 1 is enough, or? About accessibility there are some workarounds, but I am not happy with them.

What do you suggest now?
__________________
"Being an expert isn't telling other people what you know. It's understanding what questions to ask, and flexibly applying your knowledge to the specific situation at hand. Being an expert means providing sensible, highly contextual direction." Jeff Atwood
SEO Workers - Search Engine Optimization Consulting Company | SEO Analysis Tool | Webnauts Net SEO
Last edited by Webnauts; 08-10-2008 at 09:15 AM.
Reply With Quote