Quote:
Originally Posted by Clint1
I have to say this again. " SEO'ers & bloggers" here and at other forums continuously lose sight of the simple fact that not every site owner has a site about news, blogs, SEO, etc. Believe it or not, there are websites out there that sell static consumer products and for those type sites, there is no need or use for videos, audio, podcasts, etc., . |
Dead wroooong! Universal search is now being used for over 50% of searches. Pages are getting pushed down by the content silos Google is using. IME, YouTube is way better than Google video but... do both. I haver a client that receives thousands of new vistirors a month from the 300 product videos he's got ion youTube. These videos have also increased conversions so... I gotta' think you are making assumptions about this without really giving it a try.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clint1
nor any new content unless you happen to get in a new product. Those areas are only specific for certain niches or genres. Once a product's webpage is up, some kind of consumer good, there is not only no reason to change it, but you can't change it unless its specs should happen to change.
|
Totally False and misleading! There is not a shred of evidence to support that thesis... in fact I'd argue til the cows come home the opposite is true!
"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clint1
Content" is not king. It should be, but it's not. What is "king", is having a big name and or high PR website, that's a site to which other site owners will have a need to link.I do not disagree that video, audio, news, blogs, etc., are growing and moving forward. What I'm saying is that not ALL websites can benefit from that, and it is these types sites that are (AGAIN) going to be harmed by G. |
Blinded by the links. Once again I'd argue til the cows come home the opposite is true because the only way you become an authority site is if you have good content.