Quote:
Originally Posted by galide
mmh, I see that you are still fighting around guys, for something which is fairly simple:
1) Some of us state that it is possible since they have seen it in action
2) Some of us say that it may be possible and think that it is possible
3) Some of us say that it might be possible but are still undecided about whether it is possible or not
4) Some of us say that it might be possible but think that it is not possible provided that they have not seen any proof of it.
and ..
1) Those who know that it is possible refuse to provide us a proof of their statement, and ask the "sceptic" to rely on their word
2) Those who think that it is possible rely on other people's posts who state that it is possible
3) Those who are still undecided have to rely on people relying on people posts who state that it is possible
4) Those who don't believe that it can happen are not provided with any proof
So... what is the point of carrying on this thread?
|
Welcome back galide.
Mostly accurate but I'd have said it like this...
Some of us tested the idea, seen tests of the idea, seen it happen, and/or know it can happen based on experience, and combining that with all the other credible information available, know IBL's can indeed harm a site.
Some of us, based on exactly the same information above, are either not sure, or remain staunchy unconvinced since they have not seen it happen themselves. Kinda like needing to drive a new car before accepting that it can run, or seeing the airbag deploy before accepting that it does indeed work.
I can accept that.
Dave