Quote:
Originally Posted by ctabuk
The word is lies - and if you can quote me chapter and verse that I have said anywhere that 'I invented RSS' then I will resign at WPW immediatly and never darken its doors again.
|
I will take you up on your offer...
Taken from...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctabuk
I was the guy that devised (with faglork) the whole concept of RSS feeds direct into websites to add fresh content
|
So, you said "devised the whole concept" as opposed to "invented". As a wordsmith yourself, tell me the difference.
But when we called you on it, then you admitted:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctabuk
What faglork and I did was to find a way of feeding Google Alerts directly into a URL page for constantly updated news feeds based on relevancy of topic - most likely 'duplicated content'!
|
I guess you did not devise the whole concept as previously claimed.
Where you have claimed your superiority... Let's take a look at your RSS claim in total...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctabuk
Greetings, thanks for the input - we are both writers - if you actually read my posts I do make the inference of the word 'But all the good stuff is written, well without appearing pedantic there are certain topics where volumes have been previously written and seeing how I was the guy that devised (with faglork) the whole concept of RSS feeds direct into websites to add fresh content then I do know a little about this. I am a published author and I invite people to add their content and links to my blogs. I will do my utmost to assist any poster to achieve high serp - but copyright and fresh content all legally two entirely different aspects. I'm on your side - just try stepping outside of the box and look at what I try to do to assist people.
|
Because "you know a little bit about this", we should just take your word for it that
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctabuk
Let's leave it there.
Duplicate content - OK you want to fill a blog or a website with fresh and meaningful content. But all the good stuff has been written.
|
Hashed and rehashed topics do not mean that everything that has ever been said is all that can ever be said on a subject.
You have painted with a wide paint brush to suggest that no one is capable of writing anything good on a subject, without stealing someone elses Copyrighted work.
But, you are a published author, so it is okay for you to say such things. Your published author status gives you power over the topic that no one else can touch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctabuk
I'm actually enjoying this more than any other time at WPW - excellent stuff.
Please quote my name - and stop reporting posts they come through on my e-mail system
Now, I'm trying to work out which one is the ventriloquist and which one is the dummy. So please extol my virtues in full - go for it - where have I said that my knowledge is the greatest around WPW - because I can tell you now - I am a marketer not a technical guy. I am intrigued  |
So much for oversight. Who oversees you? No one? No wonder you can approach this with such a flip attitude, Mr. David C Tabuk of the UK (whose published book could not be located in google.com or google.co.uk).
AVC:
Quote:
Originally Posted by AVC
Right, this is a sure bet to be a blockbuster thread and will draw in all the signature spammers in the land !!! 
Keep an eye on this spam trap mod's !!! |
Is this to suggest that anyone participating in this thread should be targeted as a spammer???
Mr mod simply pissed me off on a number of levels. If that makes me a spammer, then so be it!
This is the kind of crap that caused me to stop participating at Site-Reference forums. But that was caused by a number of threads like these two, where mods let their power go to their heads. Will I leave WPW? I don't know yet.
AVC: I challenge you to take twenty minutes to read the original thread, and if you don't believe that Mr mod was not out of line, then I will drop it.
Signed,
Just another link spammer I guess.