View Single Post
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2008, 01:55 AM
Tubby's Avatar
Tubby Tubby is offline
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kajabbi N.W Queensland - (Outback)
Posts: 1,290
Tubby RepRank 3Tubby RepRank 3
Default Re: Dividing WPW in two parts.

webnauts said
"What do you all think about that?"

The two forums are monetized totally differently. without taking a good look it would be hard for me to work out exactly how the site reference creates its income.

I have a vague understand how WPW creates income.

The two sites do not stand on level ground when it comes to creating income. the site basics use a different model, simply picking a model from somewhere else may well look simple. . But not the sort of thing I would attempt without a thorough understanding of how all the nuts and bolts fit together.

Millions of forums out there John, to imagine that they are all financially viable is a huge step, many forums servive because they support a product . . If the forum compromises the product . . . Well.. Poof goes the forum.

I certainly do not know enough about the nuts and bolts of WPW. I do not really want to. . I just like the company, I enjoy posting my opinion.

Presumably someone from up high is reading this thread - and chuckling to themselves. (we have absolutely no clue about what makes this place tick!)

The chances are if a member handed out some SEO help and got $10 you would complain that the member was not professional. maybe nobody has ever made a donation? does anyone on that site claim they make any Peanut$ from the forum?


John, your own forum is supported your own product, SEO services, you protect your own product so dearly that only the minimal few get to post anything at all. . . I certainly do not blame you for not compromising your own product. . yet you sometimes suggest things that you would never ever ever, ever do to yourself. .
__________________
These site are for sale. Restored Classics - car directory - Latest ads

Last edited by Tubby : 01-29-2008 at 02:01 AM.
Reply With Quote