Quote:
Originally Posted by rumblepup
Now John, I did point to facts, a quote from W3C.
Their is nothing in the HTML Transitional architecture which discounts table based design.
In fact, I bet you I can point to a table based design that is W3C compliant, and that sucker has images in cells, and tables within tables, and all that good stuff.
Here's the W3C test page for an Inc 500 site
John, you've know me long enough to think I'm against you in any way. Just a difference of opinion. |
You are right man. I guess I thought I missed something at some point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rumblepup
I could care less about Rand, but Matt Cutts and Vanessa Fox? You wanna double check who they are?
|
I already triple checked. Vanessa and Matt tells what Google want them to tell and no more. I said I heard and read stuff of them that were not also accurate. For me they are kind of Technical
PR persons for Google from my perspective.
I have no doubts that Rand is a good
SEO guy, but I do not rely on him or anyone else. If he is longer in the
SEO business, which more support than others, and he can sell himself and his services, does not make him an authority.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rumblepup
Bruce Clay is a fantastic SEO bro, but he is also the inventor of LinkMaps, a wierdo technology that never really worked, and he has stopped selling. |
Well I just mentioned him to see the reaction of some members who consider him as an authority. Thanks for supporting my point there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rumblepup
We all have our defects, and I am for sure someone full of defects, but I think we are all here to have an open mind as well.
|
I agree that everyone has defects somewhere, somehow. I try though to hide or disable my defects, by telling or doing things only when I am evidence-based backed-up.
And please do not underestimate yourself brother. We both know that you are not the one who has the most or too many defects.
