View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-26-2007, 04:47 PM
Webnauts's Avatar
Webnauts Webnauts is offline
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 8,167
Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9
Default Re: Tables to CSS, W3C validation and Search Engines

Well I see you that you all would not agree with me, if I say that tableless CSS and valid code can improve your rankings.

Therefore you do agree with Bruce Clay and Google either:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Clay
When I redid my site, I switched from tables entirely to CSS. I also made it W3C compliant. That may be something that emerges. I was moderating a panel at adTech and Google said that the cleaner the code, chances are the search engines will get a better idea of what your site is about. From that point of view, go to CSS because it's simpler.
Source: Organic Listings Forum: SES, San Jose 2007 » PageTraffic Blog

Anyway...
__________________
"Being an expert isn't telling other people what you know. It's understanding what questions to ask, and flexibly applying your knowledge to the specific situation at hand. Being an expert means providing sensible, highly contextual direction." Jeff Atwood
SEO Workers - Search Engine Optimization Consulting Company | SEO Analysis Tool | Webnauts Net SEO

Last edited by Webnauts; 12-26-2007 at 04:50 PM.
Reply With Quote