Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter (IMC)
You know, once you´re "duly elected" you have 4 years. A company's popularity can be broken any time. The popularity of a company is more democratically determined than a government's.  |
Supreme court justices are appointed for life. When it comes to laws in the US, you can't get much higher than that. Not sure what "popularity" has to do with this. Comparing Googles guidelines to "breaking the laws" that are/were put in place by duly elected or appointed government agencies is a poor comparison.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter (IMC)
Actually, there´s nothing wrong with that. And in Google's case you can even say that it is working very well. The number of paid ( PR passing) links on the internet has reduced dramatically. And more importantly, so have the prices of paid links, making paid ( pr passing) link ads a lot less interesting to sell. |
Broad assumption Peter.
Not sure how you can say it's working very well, since neither you, nor I, nor Google have a clue as to how many "paid" links there are on the web. If Google knew how many there were, there'd be no issue. That's the problem and why their approach is so flawed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter (IMC)
Google's strategy here is working so well, goverment agencies should be jealous. |
I can't believe you posted this Peter. wow
Dave