View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 12:06 PM
crankydave's Avatar
crankydave crankydave is offline
Moderator
WebProWorld Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Playing with fire!
Posts: 4,254
crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9
Default Re: Supplemental Index Dead?

Tend to agree Jaan.

I'm not seeing a whole lt to lead me to believe, that as far as the searcher is concerned, much has changed in regards to what they are delivered for their queries.

Personally, I'm still seeing longtail queries where there's less than a page of relevant exact phase matches not showing up for a general search.

Additionaly, when using the site: operator, there's still a clear delineation between the pages that "were in the RI" and "were in the SI".

Dave
Reply With Quote