View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-15-2007, 05:25 PM
kgun's Avatar
kgun kgun is offline
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 5,714
kgun RepRank 10kgun RepRank 10kgun RepRank 10kgun RepRank 10kgun RepRank 10kgun RepRank 10kgun RepRank 10kgun RepRank 10kgun RepRank 10kgun RepRank 10kgun RepRank 10
Default Re: The ability to pass pagerank. Can it be lost?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjtaylor View Post
But isn't having to hide from Google a pragmatical rather than an ethical issue?
No, I disagree, especially if
  1. You hide to get a better ranking than other in the global search space.
  2. It is not natural. When is it natural?
  3. Other hidden goals / agendas that is used to increase your cash flow (at the price of other companies in the global search space).
But how can Google or another SE differentiate link A (paid) from link B (free) if the only information is the anchor tag and the anchor text? There is no ID, no div, no other attribute and no CSS class to differentiate the two. So I understand (and may accept) your pragmatic view, since that is (more or less) impossible. I wrote more or less in paranthesis, since advanced pattern reckognition algorithmes may be used to identify paid from free links with a probability > 1/2, that is tossing a coin.

Last edited by kgun; 12-15-2007 at 05:41 PM.
Reply With Quote