
11-30-2007, 08:22 PM
|
 |
WebProWorld Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 95
|
|
Re: Supplementals: Not What They Used To Be & Tips for Getting Out
Quote:
Originally Posted by Webnauts
Martin, IncrebibleHelp would confirm that I posted such a list about supplementals many times here the last two years, but never got credited that way. I am just wondering why?
Here is mine once again: - Pages due to canonicalization problems, e.g duplicated content, too much content similarity;
- Pages with low or no content;
- Orphaned web pages. Pages that no one links to, including your own;
- Error pages, if a site does not use If-Modified-Since, Last Modified and/or Expires rules;
- Poor website navigation;
- Loading pages with irrelevant keywords (keyword stuffing);
- Too low PageRank;
- Long URLs, especially with long parameters, starting with a question mark (?) and being separated with an ampersand (&
and are not rewriten;
- Suspicious pages for spamindexing, like non-unique and irrelevant to page content heading tags, meta tags, or linking to bad neighborhoods, etc;
- Too low PageRank.
Check how many of your pages are in the supplemental results with this tool: Supplemental Index Ratio Calculator
|
Here here Webnauts, I do recognize that your list is very good, and can be considered a "Web Design 101" list
as well.
Hey - you gotta share the love!!!
|