Quote:
Originally Posted by mjtaylor
The greater proportion of pages in the SI has not affect my sites SERPs or traffic. I wouldn't expect those pages to come up for the more competitive terms, but some rank well for longer tailed terms, just as they did before.
|
It would be nice if you could back that up with evidence based facts (statistics), otherwise I consider what you are claiming not credible at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjtaylor
I know this is 'old news', but since many webmasters still seem overly alarmed by pages in the SI, I think Matt Cutt's post last January bears excerpting (bold are my addition) |
This guy told us so many stories that after a while came out that were not true. And this story is one of them. If you look around at searchenginetable, digitalpoint, webmasterworld and other places, you will see that is not only my opinion. And thanks God for that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjtaylor
Please feel free to add any tips for getting out of the supplementals ... or to disagree. 
Cheers, MJ |
I added my tips I am preaching here since I guess too years too. And I disagree that supplemental are not same or worse than before.
Google is more sensitive than ever before, so it is easier to go in the supplemental than ever before. And supplemental pages don't rank! A lot of evidence (statistics/numbers) are posted at CTabuk forums here:
Big changes at Googles algorithms? Or did I miss something?