ME:
Fine. Let's see. I am going to show you up.
Originally Posted by mikmik
That's very bad, kgun. X(n + 1) - 1 = y(n) - a (X(n))^2
You are telling me this very simple function is chaotic? LMFAOUTLOUDSOLOUD!!!!!
It is a curve, you ninny.
kgun:
That was one of the two equations explaining the Henon map. If you want the map from a more reliable source than Wikipedia, try this from Wolfram It is the same map, though with different letters for the symbols, but you should be able to understand that. There is no difference in naming an unknown magnitude x, y, z or even mikmik. My bolding of the last sentence in the quote. Is there any point in continuing?
- - -
First off, i didn't go anywhere, i just simplified your obtuse equation. I have no idea what it represents. I do not have to look up these things, it is very basic algebra.
Obviously I was right, wasn't I? You did not give me a quadratic equation. Let us see the equations, and they are nothing like what you gave me, in fact they resovle to sumnations.
Let's go to Wolfram. "The Hénon map is the two-dimensional quadratic map given by the coupled equations..."
Not only do you give me a BS equation, ah, who cares.
You know what? I have to go into word to show this shite.
Xa+1=a2x2a +a1xa + a0
!!! Irt didn't work!
Quadratic Map -- from Wolfram MathWorld
That is not like X(n + 1) - 1 = y(n) - a (X(n))^2
They are not the same thing, kgun, and I called you on it.
You are the one getting shit off the internet, aren't you? And you try to accuse me?!
Quote:
|
To cite Einstein. If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts. Mikmik, if you have a better theory, then formulate that. I will not take the time to read it. I have more important things to do. I have more important things to do than commenting on the rest of what you write. But I shall make this one exception, so other members and surfers are able to see how wrong you are.
|
Theory on what?
A theory explains facts. No scientist in touch with reality would ever say something so insipid as "change the facts" to fit the theory. Least of all AE. It is about explaining facts, not making theories!!!!!
If you are so self absorbed that you think your theories must be accomadated by manipulating data, you are a fraud, my man.
Deeply and disgustingly.
We look for truth, not make it up and then try to convince others we are right.
You are a very sick puppy, kgun, you got that? I worship truth and the endeavor to understanding reality because it is honest and I am made from it.
What you do is like a charlatan creating a cult and claiming to speak for god.
You want a theory? I will give you a doozy. Actually, I can only give you a hypothesis.
First, answer my questions, okay?
Quote:
Quote:Originally Posted by mikmik
I merely point out your sorry equations that, like I said, are simple curve equations, as opposed to complex exponential series.
"Following the transition, solutions evolve on strange attractors that have the topology of fractal braids in Poincaré sections"
Give me a fractal equation. Here, I will give you one:
Z<-Z^2+C^2
-
How many axis does that give you?
Don't bullshit a bullshitter, kgun.
My bolding. Any point in continuing this discussion?
You degrade WPW my friend. Stop throwing out exotic words before you can add 2 + 2.
Quote:Originally Posted by mikmik
Hey, what molecular process leads to chaotic behaviour?
Hey, did you know that quantum fluids, like supercooled helium, do not act chaotically? What is a quantum state, kgun? Do you know how obtuse and regressed you sound to someone that understands the Cppenhagen interpretation?
Stop throwing out exotic words before you can add 2 + 2.
Quote:Originally Posted by mikmik
Get a diverse education. I never graduated high school, don't forget this. You want to think you are smart and show off your brains, hahahaaaaaaaa!!! My IQ isn't even very high, and I am younger than you!
Sorry, kgun, I have a low tolerance for people that use sophystry instead of making sense.
If I am wrong about anything, I always stand to be corrected, and I am wrong a lot. You see, I am also a bullshiter
My bolding. Please remove the words, also a.
You may continue fooling people in this thread. You have to refine and cultivate your language and study some elementary topics before I can use more time on your posts.
|
Try to baffle me with math, yet you evade my simple questions.
You should know that my equation is for a mandelbrot set symetrical about both the x and y axis.
I can add 2 + 2. That is what I do. I look for the simple reality that we are made of. You try to agrandize yourself by making reality look complicated, and you lie to do it.
That is my theory.