View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2007, 12:05 PM
Clint1's Avatar
Clint1 Clint1 is offline
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 1,275
Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9
Default Re: do 301s update IBL?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wige View Post
It is possible that "outdated" links (pointing to 301, 302, and 404 pages) may eventually lose weight and may even negatively impact the page they are on (because why would a search engine consider a page authoritative that has outdated links and is no longer providing a full resource) but as far as I have seen this is only theory.
Perhaps that is to what the article was referring. I'm glad I personally don't have this to worry about (that's one less out of MANY) because I never change main pages. Or, maybe I do have to worry about it. There's a ton of sites linking to my non-www version index page but I've had a 301 redirect from non-www to www for a few years now, and my PR DID drop TWO spots over a year ago, even after getting more IBL's. It's just possible to contact thousands of websites to tell them to change their link to you. A 301 "should" be sufficient.
__________________
God Bless,
-Clint
(Join Date: 2003)
Reply With Quote