View Single Post
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2007, 10:32 AM
Clint1's Avatar
Clint1 Clint1 is offline
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 1,306
Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9Clint1 RepRank 9
Default Re: Any one seen the sad anti Google advert?

Quote:
Originally Posted by azoundria View Post
One thing I have heard about Google - many of it's employees come in after-hours to help improve the engine for particular keywords which aren't displaying the best results. Google is definitely passionate about providing helpful results - which is exactly what users want.
Hi Azoundria. If google really was "passionate about providing helpful results", there wouldn't be such a thing as their satan spawned supplemental index where pages are penalized then "sequestered" and never seen by the public except for rare occasions (simply because not enough site owners have the need to link to them [low PR]); nor would they be deleting countless white-hat, unique & relevant webpages and even entire websites from their index for no reason (flawed algos). Y, MSN, etc., is much more passionate about "providing helpful results" because they do NOT delete white-hat pages and sites from their index anywhere even close to the amount google does, nor do they have a supp index.

When google stops harming the innocent at such alarming numbers, then we can call them "passionate about providing helpful results".

The only thing I can think of they do after hours, is either use crack (which would explain the basis of PR, supp index, erroneous deletions, etc.), or further tweak the algos to give even a wider edge of special benefits and special treatment, to the likes of sites like Ebay, Amazon, Bizrate, Pricegrabber, and similar.

You're a young guy, so apparently you're unaware of these things.
__________________
God Bless,
-Clint
(Join Date: 2003)

Last edited by Clint1; 08-11-2007 at 10:34 AM.
Reply With Quote