View Single Post
  #161 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2007, 09:43 AM
crankydave's Avatar
crankydave crankydave is offline
Moderator
WebProWorld Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Playing with fire!
Posts: 4,211
crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9
Default Re: Best On Page SEO Factors

Quote:
Originally Posted by weslinda View Post
Janeth,

I'm not trying to prove anything with this. I'm using those numbers as a baseline for all to measure against in six months. I'm happy you can launch a site with that much traffic in the first month.

Of course, this is a very nitch web site with a focus on one state, and one event in peoples lives. I don't expect it to get the traffic of a new web site focused on the nintendo wii. Perspective here. Again, we're only showing this as a baseline. And then in 6 months we can measure the success of the changes.

Again, what we're looking at is to see what the changes discussed in the original post will do for a web site and it's traffic. Every effort we are making has to do with changes to the site, and content added on site.
Thank you for the update.

The problem I have is that I'm not sure what is trying to be demonstrated in relation to the points you made in the original post.

Since none of the factors are/were isolated, there's no way of knowing which ones, individually or in a small combination, had any affect at all.

There's no way of knowing whether or not the same results could be achieved by utilizing only 1 or 2 of the factors.

There's also no way of knowing whether or not one or more of the factors actually surpressed the affect of the others. Not at all suggesting that they may have. It just can't be known.

Ultimately, what do you hope or anticipate this test is going to demonstrate as it relates to your original post?

Dave
Reply With Quote