Quote:
Originally Posted by incrediblehelp
Pretty much always as Google is concerned
|
Quite so, and to a point it works well, but where it fails is when used for censoring, which is the effect of using popularity to determine which content is allowed in the main index, and which is in the SI. Popularity isn't always a good guide to quality - just take a look at at a few politicians!
Quote:
Originally Posted by incrediblehelp
Yup I agree, but most of that high quality content that is not ranking has not been marketed to it fullest extent,
Sure they will if they have the right marketer or if they are truly the serving to marketing the right niche.
|
Time is Money, Money is heard. Quality + Money = Google Main Index? It's reality, but is it right?
Basically, helping these companies is what I do (and generally pretty well if given the resources) but some of these organisations don't have too many resources, and is that really a valid reason for being excluded from the main index of the leading search engine?
G should get rid of the SI and concentrate on improving relevance filters as an alternative. Maybe that's what Matt is trying to say, but they've a long way to go yet!