Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pavelhlavsa
I read all the critics to the webpage and one thing comes out loud, uniformity. Creating websites is as individual as the human creating it. We all have different tastes. So please don't forget it when evaluating someone's work.
|
I am not evaluating the taste. I am evaluating the site based on standards and evidence based facts.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pavelhlavsa
Besides, it is important to take note, who is targeted by the website. Dyslexia is hardly a problem on this particular page. People targeted would not suffer from it.
|
I am not sure if I understood this. Do you mean that dyslexics are not a part of the target audience or that dyslexics will not have a problem with the page?
If it is the second case, yes they will. Font site, paragraphs length and overall readability is not efficient at all.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pavelhlavsa
This is addressing business that needs hi degree of IT services.
|
I never heard that companies providing high degree services ignore accessibility. For example Microsoft? Google?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pavelhlavsa
I agree though the background could do with little bit of colour. Just a hint perhaps.
|
Perhaps? Contrast results for colour blindness:
Normal-colour difference :459/brightness difference :153
Protanopia-colour difference :455/brightness difference :152
Deuteranopia-colour difference :457/brightness difference :153
Tritanopia-colour difference :453/brightness difference :153
That is a disaster. Sorry.
And I am sorry if someone thinks I am to hard. But I definitely have no intention to hurt someones feelings. I am just 100% objective doing site reviews. ;)