Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dogluver
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by janeth
People are having their way with it, I think the cost is $350.00.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dogluver
Well, keep thinking that all you want. Just let me know how it goes with finding a corrupt editor. If it's as easy as you think, then I'm sure you'll find one right away. Just be sure to send us their editor name so we can lock them out of their account. And, I just hope you don't get your site banned in the process.
|
If my site got banned I might loose that one visitor this year. That would be bad. Lol
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by janeth
We agree on the mistakely think it will help you out in Google. I've read more threads about the other then about it being the largest human-edited directory.
|
c
Selective reading can do that to people sometimes. :D You know, like how they're willing to pay at most $35 to get their site listed, so they'll only pay attention to the posts that talks about corrupt editors and focus on that aspect, no matter how illogical those posts are. |
I've not seen any of the others. It's not selective reading, it's the only thing I can fond about DMOZ. Look at this thread and look at where your posting.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by janeth
I was listed in DMOZ for about two years, I think I had about 4 hits the whole two years.
|
[/quote]
My site has been listed for a few years, and I get about 1 hit per week, sometimes more or less, but it averages out to about 1 a week. I'm banking on those one hits per week to refer my site word of mouth. Kind of like how people have linked it on a forum and told people to check it out. There's nothing more humbling than having someone else refer people to my site.[/quote]
I'm not saying the one hit a week is bad but seems like to much work to get the one hit.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by janeth
I guess your the 4 hits I got. lol
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dogluver
Nah, I'm not interested in web design sites.
|
Maybe it was a different editor. (-: