Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dogluver
I've used them interchangably, too. The fact still remains that editors do not, if they don't want to, have to look at suggested sites. I'm one of those that choose not to, so the "backlog" is of no concern to me. But, it only makes sense that it would be of concern to people who are trying to get listed (and before you say anything, I'm only talking about the people who are trying to get listed and complain about how long it takes).
|
To be honest, I've no time for people who feel that they >>>MUST<<< be listed, and moan like hell when they aren't, or when they have to wait forever. DMOZ started out trying to catalogue the Web, but that was never possible, and so it became a directory of selected, quality sites (which is actually better than the orginal aim) - and that's fair enough. I often defend DMOZ against the knockers, but I also talk realistically about it, as I did in that article.