Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mike
Well, yeah, but if you're Google, isn't that noise you refer to something like 'cha-ching'?
In other words it really isn't in their own (Google's) interest for these kinds of sites to diminish -at this point. But it does seem, if you follow a progession line, that at some point down the road they'll have to check them somehow or other or they will run the risk of burning up some userbase.
Or not... I dunno. I'm just asking. Seems logical to me.
(Oh and for the record, I can't imagine why anyone would use content match unless they were just tired of having money. But that's another subject for another thread.)
|
Quite right.
Let's say for example they have reached critical mass. They have the quantity of sites they're comfortable with, now we work on quality. As each new one is approved, the ones at the "bottom" as far as what they "provide" in the means of quality (revenue?) are concerned are found in "violation" and removed.
Dave
( yes, the content network is little more than filling the "bowl" and pulling the chain)