Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mnsandy
I think this is very serious quality score, if they look for "x topic" and they stay on site 20 minutes, this site is good on that topic, but if he clicks and then clicks away, it might be bad for the site quality;
|
Nice idea, mnsandy, but I see a monkey wrench there.
Let's say I am only looking to compare the price of a product skipping around 10 different web sites in 1 minute flat. I then go to mull things over and end up buyng it at Wal-Mart, because I go there anyways tomorrow.
Does that make for bad quality for those 10 sites?
Let's say I go to a site or 2 to compare some research, but the phone rings as soon as I get there and I leave the pc for 30 minutes with the sites still displayed.
Does that make for quality sites?
All in all, I think WE know when we hit on a bad or good site. Bookmarking is one way of expressing that.
I find that a valid way, but it leaves out people with good memories, lol. Such as in the case of my site. It's specific to helping cigarette smokers and is named for what the product does. Many wont bookmark it, because it is easy to remember.
I believe we are caught in a catch 22 at this stage of the game and whoever can come up with a (nearly) fool-proof method, will rival Bill's bank account in a very short time. Any comments?