Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chris
some of you guys are entirely too black or white for discussions like this. DrTandem, no i do not think every adult site out there is trying "lure" kids... in fact, i remember from my childhood (before i was 18) trying to sneak peeks at any playboys or penthouses lying around. were those publications trying to lure me into a sordid pedophile ring (i think not)? or was it the person's fault who left the mag laying around where a young teen could get ahold of it (same as a parent that won't take the time to introduce filters and passwords into their children's internet use).
|
Chris, I did not say that all porn sites were trying to lure kids. I said porn sites that use links and URLs that attract children were trying to lure children to their sites. Pay attention.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chris
the problem is you have internet illiterates trying to settle the biggest technological frontier in ages. and they are failing miserably at it. with that in mind, yes, warning pages for LEGITIMATE sites is all that should be required. going after internet pedophiles with standards that don't even address their methods of attracting victims is pathetic.
|
You missed the point. Re-read the law. It simply says that links and URLs that are designed to attract children to porn sites are verboten. It doesn't ban the site.