Peter,
To some extent, I see your point, but on the flip side, some laws do not amount to anything but political positioning just like BJ pointed out above.
Is anyone going to prosecute WPW for the link I posted earlier in this thread? Abjectly not!, it's information, not porn.
"Accidentals" are a very small part of the problem here... Let's all understand that loud and clear, especially when we can't even legislatively determine what pornography is.
There's your real loophole!
The kids all know certain keywords to look up, because they all whisper them to each other when the hormones start raging...
Blame it on the food additives or God, it really doesn't matter more than a couple years anyway!
"Accidentals" just don't stack up more than 1 or 2% probably, in face of the real issue here!: Straight out access to anything they want to see is at the real core, most of the time without parental restrictions or guidence.
"Respect" and "Wisdom" are almost archaic words in the English language anymore. I guess parents can't teach their kids what they don't know themselves though, can they?
The lax approach by some parents, whether it comes by lack of knowledge or a blind eye can't be legislated, and those kids are always going to be popular with their secret whisperings in their own little community.
That's just a fact of life that cannot be regulated by any law.
It still comes down to the parents primarily here, not legislation by unknowing lawmakers.
Ken
|