Quote:
|
Originally Posted by incrediblehelp
Very clear here, but if the SE were to factor in the validity of the code for all websites it has indexed the search results would be very different and probably worse. Why would a more valid website be more relevant? It wouldn't and their in lies the issue and problems for the search engines.
The relevancy of the SERP"s is so much more important to them than whether a website is valid or not.
Now if all things were consider for tow websites and most current SEO factors were equal: relevancy, content, IBL's, etc and then they choose to list one website over another because it was more valid than the other, feel free to. It will never get more than that. |
I would like to add my previous quotation (banknote) once again here:
- I do not know any better "vacuum cleaner" than Search Engines, which can clean up the junk on the Web.
I think I need to covert my banknote into coins here:
How much percent of those bad marked-up
high quality web sites owners would not bother cleaning up their code, if search engines would require that for indexing.
And so much percent of garbage will be ripped off the Web.
So once again to my other previous question:
- If sites can be found, but cannot be accessed, how can they be used? Or do you think it is funny for users who are looking for information using search engines, and they get a mass of garbage? Or exists a filter software which I can filter all that?