View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2006, 01:39 PM
brian.mark's Avatar
brian.mark brian.mark is offline
Administrator
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,717
brian.mark RepRank 2brian.mark RepRank 2
Default

Actually, I was meaning that the same subnets can't be on both sides. You can't have 192.168.16.___ on both sides and expect it to route properly.

It sounds like your cisco device is doing NAT already, which is usually the goal of putting PC's behind a server. What are you trying to accomplish? I think we need to take a step back here.

Brian.
__________________
ToolBarn.com, an Internet Retailer Top 500 and Inc. 500 Company | Tool Parts | Pet Supplies
Reply With Quote