View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-28-2003, 11:25 AM
mikmik's Avatar
mikmik mikmik is offline
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 3,406
mikmik RepRank 1
Default

Hi janeth
janeth wrote:
Quote:
Here is my two cents for what it is worth.

If I was Google and had gotten as big as they are, then I would look around.

I have MSN and Yahoo wanting a piece of the action. I'm as big as I will ever be, my job is just trying to stay #1 now.

I would try and make as much money as I could because no one stays #1 for ever and I can only get smaller as the others enter the game.


Yes! They have a legal 'right' to do business that way. That's what businesses do!
Daniel Brandt, with talk like this:
Quote:
That's the political reality, but I'm arguing that we have the social and ethical right, as world citizens, to ask that Google explain themselves. Five or ten years from now, the political reality will have shifted and this argument from me won't be inviting such short-sighted responses. My main problem is that I'm ahead of my time.

But I must say, I didn't expect to be criticized on the grounds that no one even has the right to investigate Google. That's a real surprise to me.
, you sound like the famous 'UFO Researcher' that was invited to a CSIOCOP convention (Commitee for Scientific Investigation OF Claims OF the Paranormal, a well known, well respected forum of scientific researchers and rational thinkers). He presented his subject which he had determined, after interviewing her about her reported 'alien abduction', that it was a genuine claim. When it was then revealed to him, in front of the assembly he was 'lecturing' that she was just making the story up as part of an investigation, and she herself stood there and told him herself, he them maintained, get this, that she had in fact really been abducted and didn't know it!!!!
I demand, as is my right, that you reveal to us your true motivation behind your obvious attempt at manipulating the media for attention. It is my fundamental right, as an investor to know if my decisions are being influenced by 'ulteriorly motivated' analysis. Furthermore, I will decide when you are telling the truth. It is my right to know. So let's have it. Do you follow your own rules?
You are not allowed to hide anything for your own well being, not if I am on to you for shenanigans.

So tell us, what are you really up to? You are trying to gain unfair advantage in the use of 'truth' in order to cover up your paranoia, so you have to now reveal all.

Yikes!
And quit reading my cerebral cortex with those transmissions!!

Oh ya.Touristips notes, for the record, thus:
Quote:
Go public and cash out quick.
My brother does have a masters from Stanford.
My mom does have a Doctorate of Psychology from the University of Alberta, and they are world renowned. That proves it.
__________________
What I am is what I am, are you what you are, or what.
Eddie Brickel
Reply With Quote