Quote:
|
Originally Posted by faglork
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by greeneagle
I am seeing Jagger3 update busting CSS Spamers:
|
Yeah, if you put Goog's nose right onto them. Otherwise, not.
As I said in another post: If Google were to penalize all those "minor issues", then many good no-spam sites would fall out, and the real spammers who know their CSS would stay in. This is not in Google's interest (as I believe).
We have seen that Google is - in many cases - not able to detect even the most blatant spam. Do you think Google catches the small fish ("there is a 4 percent chance that this might be spam ... lets kick it out") because it can't get the big ones?
I don't buy that.
Cheers,
faglork |
Actually, faglork might be right, Ken.
In this case, I posted your "web development pricing" scenario in Matt Cutts' blog on Saturday, two days before you posted that it was removed. I don't know if that's coincidence or not, but it may have something to do with yours truly.
Mind you, I don't know, but it's a possibility.