Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KeithO
I also understood you to be saying that if a high PR web site displays your adwords ad that their PR would rub off on you. |
No, I do not endorse links for
PR only. It doesnt do any good. I know Adwords are redirects and DO NOT PASS
PR NOR LP. They are a means of traffic. A purchased link is Adwords, they are both marketing campaigns, period. My purchased links on Christmas.com are judged the same as my paid links on Adwords. This is where we differ. I toke it you said a purchased link is different than adwords. In the realm of
PR that is true, but I do not care about
PR only traffic so they are one and the same to me.
My disagreement is to categorize "buying a link" with the mention of "
PR 9" as automatic TABOO item is incorrect. If it is relevant and provides good marketing then its good and Google will count it if the link is static and direct.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jacobwissler
You just told the world that this will be a purchased link. Not a good idea. I am confident that Google discounts paid links, or will in the future.
|
This statement is not only presumptuous and incorrect but would completely throw Google's algo to the wind. Google bases so much on links. There is no merit in that statement but it his opinion. Just as most say recip links do not count as much. That is not true. Paid links not counting is a myth. It needs to be expanded to relevancy. I have my own opinion with results to back it up. Our paid advertisements is part of marketing and they also help our organic LP when they are direct static links.
DMC