Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pne
gworld said:"My question to supporter of DMOZ is how come an organization that as a matter of policy does not feel that it needs to respond to anyone or justify any decision when it comes to it's critics, it requires that they have to justify and prove every and any statement? "
They don't want a "debate" on your terms so they don't invite one.
pne
|
Do you mean being reasonable, provide proof and be honest is "MY TERMS" and it is WRONG?
If I understand your position correctly it goes like this:
DMOZ- does not need to be reasonable, logical or ethical, every one else should.
DMOZ- does not need to answer critics since it is discussing on other people's term and every one else should just keep quite or if they dare to talk, they should provide the highest proof for every little detail that they mention.
with this kind of thinking, no wonder that DMOZ editors (some moderators here) were trying to censor and delete other people's post before they were stopped by rich_ord, CEO of iEntry.
Sorry, but this is still a democracy and this kind of reasoning is not accepted. Now if DMOZ, some of it's editors and supporters open a forum in North Korea, I am sure that goverment there will have much more symphaty for this kind of logic but then who wants to participate in such forum?