View Single Post
  #357 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2004, 03:48 PM
brizzie brizzie is offline
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 43
brizzie RepRank 0
Default

Quote:
how come an organization that as a matter of policy does not feel that it needs to respond to anyone or justify any decision when it comes to it's critics, it requires that they have to justify and prove every and any statement?
Most of the critics here, and everywhere else DMOZ is discussed, have not the faintest understanding of the concept of DMOZ as a non-commercial, voluntary project. Most of the vocal critics are people who have made a fundamental mistake of thinking DMOZ is something it isn't, and because of that they start ranting, throwing accusations around without proof, and being generally very unpleasant about unpaid volunteers, 99% of whom have done nothing but give up their spare time. Why do you think most editors don't respond? Why do you think more and more editors now refuse point blank to answer emails? We are not paid to put up with crap, so we don't have to.
Reply With Quote