jawn_tech - I essentially agree with your response. The original article did report the opinions of others, but what it did not do is report (or investigate) the facts behind things like, for example, the submission history (ie spam) of those with the opinions being expressed. As as come out in the 2 threads, and IMHO, the opinions they have are 'null and void' in the context that they are blaming DMOZ for a problem brought on by themselves.

I think that is the problem that quadrille may be alluding to (Please correct me if I am wrong).

CBP