CRich your credibility just dropped a few pegs for this bullshit... here's why.

I spent a year moderating here at WebProWorld. I accepted the position because I thought this new venue has the resources to become a leader in "e" knowledge sharing, and wanted to be associated with such a venue to add my voice to theirs.

Not long ago I disagreed with a WebProWorld Administration decision to request for another moderator's resignation because a few members here cared less about the rules, and decided it was "so easy" to harrass that moderator...

rather than banning these members for obvious ill-will, WebProWorld decided to ignore the long standing support they received from a dedicated & loyal person in favor of less than professional slugs that think it is professional to re-dress private matters in public.

To bring this closer to home and your thread starter... I have a ton of information about inside discussions that went on inside WebProWorld and if I started posting these at other venues where WebProWorld has zero control over such dialogue - would you call this:

1. Newsworthy

2. Professional, and

3. A factual record of event that need public discussions?

Regardless of the event - most often public discussions of internal matters for any organization is an attempt to "get even"... not because an outcast is right or wrong - just because they can and it makes them feel "in control".

Please delete this thread... it isn't newsworthy what-so-ever and whether intentional or unintentional it promotes unprofessional conduct.

__________________
New daily advice on Advance SEO, Copyright & DMCA @ Twitter